GNU Free Documentation License
- GFDL redirects here. For other meanings of the term, please see GFDL (disambiguation)
The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is a copyleft license for free content, designed by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for the GNU project. The current state of the license is version 1.2, the official text of which can be found at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html.
The license is designed for software documentation and other reference and instructional materials. It stipulates that any copy of the material, even if modified, carry the same license. Those copies may be sold but, if produced in quantity, have to be made available in a format which facilitates further editing. Wikipedia is the largest documentation project to use this license.
Many people and groups, notably the Debian project (based on their Debian Free Software Guidelines), consider the GFDL a non-free license. The reasons for this are that the GFDL allows "invariant" text which cannot be modified or removed, and that its prohibition against digital rights management (DRM) systems affects valid usages as well.
Secondary Sections
The license explicitly separates any kind of "Document" from "Secondary Sections", which may not be integrated with the Document, but exist as front-matter materials or appendices. Secondary sections can contain information regarding the author's or publisher's relationship to the subject matter, but not any subject matter itself. While the Document itself is wholly editable, and is essentially covered by a license equivalent to (but both-ways incompatible with) the GNU General Public License, some of the secondary sections have various restrictions designed primarily to deal with proper attribution to previous authors.
Specifically, the authors of prior versions have to be acknowledged and certain "invariant sections" specified by the original author and dealing with his or her relationship to the subject matter may not be changed. If the material is modified, its title has to be changed (unless the prior authors give permission to retain the title). The license also has provisions for the handling of front-cover and back-cover texts of books, as well as for "History", "Acknowledgements", "Dedications" and "Endorsements" sections.
Materials for which commercial redistribution is prohibited
Materials for which commercial redistribution is prohibited generally cannot be used in a GFDL-licensed document, e.g. a Wikipedia article, because the license does not exclude commercial re-use. However in some specific cases, commercial re-uses may be fair use and in that case such materials do not need to be licensed to fall within the GFDL if such fair use is covered by all potential subsequent uses. One good example of such liberal and commercial fair use is parody.
Criticisms of the GNU Free Documentation License
There are a number of criticisms made about the GNU FDL, with some critics suggesting to authors to use other licenses, such as the creative commons license, or even using the GNU GPL.
Overly broad DRM clause
The GNU FDL states"
- You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute.
A criticism of this language is that it is too broad, because it applies to private copies made but not distributed. This may be interpreted to mean that you may not be able to legally zip or encrypt GNU FDL copies you 'make' since they 'obstruct' the reading of the material. As well the term 'technical measures' is also undefined, and thus can be broadly interpreted.
Invariant sections
A GNU FDL work can quickly be encumbered because the original title must be kept. This could lead to the situation where there are a whole series of title pages, and dedications, in each and every copy of the book if it has a long lineage. These pages cannot ever be removed, at least not until the work enters the public domain after copyright expires.
GPL incompatible in both directions
The GNU FDL is incompatible in both directions with the GPL, that is GNU FDL material cannot be put into a GPL program, and text from a GNU program cannot be put into the GFDL. Because of this, code samples are often dual-licensed so that they may appear in documentation.
History
It is hard to find information about the history of the GFDL. There was a version 1.0 and a version 1.1.
Related articles
- Copyright
- Copyleft
- Free software license
- GNU
- Open content
- Open Content License
- Creative Commons
- Open hardware
- Public domain
- Free machine
External links
Here are resources discussing the appropriateness of the GFDL:
- The GNU Free Documentation License (http://www.fsf.org/licenses/fdl.html)
- Draft of Debian position statement about the GFDL (http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml)
- Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL (http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html)
- Why Wikitravel isn't GFDL (http://wikitravel.org/en/article/Wikitravel:Why_Wikitravel_isn%27t_GFDL): Problems with using the GFDL for short printed texts
- The Free Universal Encyclopedia And Learning Resources (http://www.gnu.org/encyclopedia/)
ca:GNU Free Documentation License cs:GFDL cy:GNU FDL da:GNU Free Documentation License de:GNU Freie Dokumentationslizenz es:Licencia de documentación libre GNU eo:GFDL fo:GNU Free Documentation License fr:Licence de documentation libre GNU fy:GNU/FDL gl:Licencia de Documentación Libre GNU id:GFDL is:Frjálsa GNU handbókarleyfið it:GNU Free Documentation License ku:Lîsansa Belgekirina Azada GNU nl:GNU Vrije Documentatie Licentie ja:GNU FDL ka:GNU Free Documentation License lb:GNU Free Documentation License lt:GNU FDL minnan:GNU Chū-iû Bûn-kiāⁿ Hí-khó-su nds:GNU-FDL oc:Licéncia de documentacion liura GNU pl:GNU Free Documentation License pt:GNU FDL ro:GNU FDL simple:GNU Free Documentation License sl:GNU FDL sr:ГНУ-ова ЛСД fi:GNU Free Documentation License sv:GNU FDL vi:Bản Quyá»n vá» Tà i Liệu Miá»…n Phà zh-cn:GNU自由文档协议证书 zh-tw:GNU自由文檔許可證書